Home |  FAQs |  Calendar |  Search |  Login
News Categories

No subcategories

News and Announcements
House Bill 3200 and You
Published: Sep 1, 2009

HB 3200 and You:

Making Sense of National Healthcare Legislation

 
By the time you read this edition of the Capital Star, we might know more about HB 3200, but then again perhaps not since Congress is in summer recess for all of August.  This thousand plus page bill is the proposed government health plan. The question is, how would this affect dentists?  The general consensus is that no one has read the bill!   I looked on the Dentaltown website, http://www.dentaltown.com./ to see if anyone was talking about this and found a thread entitled “Are Dentists Included in the 1000 Plus Pages of National Health Insurance proposal being voted on in the House?” There is lively discussion about the bill and the dental implications.   I downloaded the pdf of the bill and did a search for anything dental. http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=111_cong_bills&docid=f:h3200ih.txt.pdf What I found is a provision to subsidize training for dental professionals to serve “underserved and vulnerable populations”. SEC. 799C. FUNDING THROUGH PUBLIC HEALTH INVESTMENT FUND specifies appropriations year- by- year until 2019 for just over $3 billion for this initiative. As near as I can tell, the present form of the bill does not specifically recommend any changes to the current delivery model of dentistry in the US.

Others offering their opinions on Dentaltown feel that since dental plans are piggy backed onto patients medical plans, when employers...large or small... shop for their package of benefits, more companies and employees will switch to a government plan and the incidence of patients with dental insurance will greatly diminish. Some see this as not a bad thing.  One post offers the opinion that, “it doesn’t matter if a person has benefits or not because only the patients that are motivated are the ones that enjoy regular preventive care”. He continues to make the point that a significant portion of those that now have coverage let their benefits go to waste due to non-utilization and the less that have insurance will eliminate waste in the system.   Another opinion is that, “a certain percentage of our patients will just stay away from our offices due to the financial considerations of having to pay for their routine preventive care out of their very highly taxed pockets”.   One Florida dentist stated that, “one thing is certain... I will absolutely close my doors the day government tells me I must see entitlement patients.  I'll walk away that day and let everything go into default.  I promise”.  Sounds dramatic and some might actually walk away from patient care, but the reality is that most of us need to work and have bills and obligations just like others. We are not all rich doctors as perceived by politicians and patients.   Many feel that it will be difficult to fund an extensive overhaul of the healthcare system.  One “Townie” (what regulars on Dentaltown call themselves) states that, “the plan cannot be sustained financially without taxing the middle class. It is going to be apparent to them (the middle class) soon and they will turn on themselves. It is already happening. I'd like to suggest that Dentistry offers a good example for the medical health care reform problem. Every day, dentists and patients have meaningful discussions about the care that is going to be given and received, the actual cost and who is going to pay for it. This is something that is completely lacking in medical care since doctors and patients are so far removed from the cost and payment issue. There is no incentive for doctors and patients to really care that much about how much the treatment is going to cost.... ergo, costs spiral out of control.”   Included in HB 3200 is a section delineating employer requirements. Essentially, one may choose to offer coverage, contribute toward coverage, or contribute in lieu of coverage for employees and their dependents. The way I read it, this only applies to businesses with an annual payroll of more than $400,000. There is also a mention of a tax on individuals without “acceptable” health care coverage of 2.5% of adjusted gross income.   Certainly, there will be many changes by the time the House passes it and more when the Senate version is presented. Then the final bill will come out of a conference committee. If the profession of dentistry is not being consulted for its input, why not? We as health care professionals are affected in many ways by whatever happens since we are in a unique position of being care providers, small business owners, and employers. The way we deliver care or what we charge is likely to change, as business owners, we will be expected to pay taxes to support the program, and as employers, we are expected to provide “acceptable” health care coverage to our employees and their dependents.    The general consensus at this point is that little is known about what this bill actually contains. I’ve looked at pieces of it and the language, references, and subsections are bewildering to say the least. You have the link so you can go look at HR 3200 and be better informed. Stay tuned- your future depends on it!
 
1
Web Counter by TrafficFile.com